Home - Parishes - Staff - Pastoral Guidelines - Clergy  - Schools
What's New
At Powell Butte - Ministries - Protecting God's Children - Bishop Vasa's Articles

THE MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA        December 9, 2004

While I have tried to avoid longer trips during the winter months of December and January and even February, the second week of Advent proved to be a bit of an exception. I did schedule Confirmation in the parishes of Holy Redeemer at LaPine, Holy Trinity at Sunriver and Our Lady of the Snows at Gilchrist with the expectation that these short trips would be more than manageable in the early part of December. Unfortunately my desire to provide for a full series of FaithWorks presentations required a December trip to Klamath Falls. Fortunately the forecasted snow storm for Saturday night was postponed for a few days making for a very pleasant, albeit overcast, trip down and back on Sunday afternoon and evening.
There were only four young people from LaPine to comprise the 2004 Confirmation class which means that the stress and pressure normally distributed among a larger group was concentrated on only a few. It was obvious and it was also clearly expressed to me several times that the candidates were extremely nervous. Hopefully the nervousness largely passed after the opening remarks when I indicated that the ones who ought to be nervous were the sponsors who, after all, were responsible for knowing the faith and imparting it to the Confirmation candidates. None of the candidates flunked and none of them passed out though there may have been a bit of hyperventilation in anticipation. I suspect that these young people will remember their Confirmation but it is certainly not my desire that they remember it because it was so traumatic! I hope they remember it because it took place during Advent, because it took place in the Year of the Eucharist and because the central instruction was that they ask for the Gift of Fortitude to remain especially faithful to the Eucharist during this wonderful Year of the Eucharist and throughout the whole of their lives.
As I pointed out two weeks ago, I am reminding confirmands and congregations that the prayer calling down the Holy Spirit upon the candidates asks that they be filled “with the spirit of wonder and awe in Your presence”. This is a wonderful theme for us as we prepare for Christmas and as we enter into this Year of the Eucharist. I have thought this week of the wonder and awe of the shepherds as they approached that stable outside of Bethlehem and sought out the one who came to rest in a manger. What a marvelous example of wonder and awe in the presence of the Lord. We might argue that we do not have choirs of angels singing Glory to God in the highest to 'set the mood' and yet as we approach Eucharist with a spirit of wonder and awe we can well remember that this same choir of angels constantly sings the Lord's praises. Perhaps as we deepen our own sense of wonder and awe we too might 'hear' this choir and more joyously exult in the presence of our Savior. I am convinced that the greatly increased attendance at Mass on Christmas Eve and Day is a sign of an inner longing for that sense of wonder and awe in Christ's presence. Like the shepherds at that first Christmas who heard and came, came and saw, saw and believed, believed and rejoiced so also many who have become distanced from the Church through the year once again hear and subsequently long to rejoice in the Lord. May the spirit of wonder and awe of the shepherds permeate every element of our Christmas preparations, especially our liturgical preparations, so we may truly meet the Lord this Christmas.
At Klamath Falls we presented the last of the Stewardship series of the FaithWorks program. Through the course of these five presentations several hundred parishioners were able to hear and, in part, be challenged by the message of Stewardship. It is hoped that this initial presentation of the concepts of Stewardship will be the beginning of a more explicit recognition on the part of all of the necessity of making Stewardship an integral part of our Diocesan and Parochial life.
As I have traveled throughout the Diocese this year I have found at almost every FaithWorks presentation one or two or more persons who have attended a Parish Evangelization Retreat. At almost every presentation someone will come up and tell me what a marvelously grace filled impact the Parish Retreat had in their lives. Klamath Falls was no exception. There I was told that the most recent retreat was a source of grace, conversion and even tears. This is not the exception, this is a very common response to the Parish Retreat. Unfortunately only a relatively small number of Parishes have requested to have the Retreat brought to them. I do believe that this evangelization effort of the Diocesan Office is extremely valuable. One of the most wonderful things about it is that it is largely a lay apostolate. While it cannot happen in a Parish without the active involvement, invitation and cooperation of the Pastor, in those Parishes where it has been presented it has been the laity who have encouraged their pastors to host the retreat. This is a beautiful expression of a specific lay apostolate but it is also an expression of an appropriate Stewardship. It is very easy to say, 'Father, you should invite the Diocese to present that retreat here'. It is better, I suggest, in an appropriate Stewardship model, for one or two or more parishioners to approach the pastor and suggest that they would be willing to help host a Parish Evangelization Retreat and that they will take care of all the publicity, arrangements, contacts, setup, cleanup, costs and details of hospitality. While the responsibility for the spiritual well being of the Parish rests largely with the pastor the reality is that everyone has a vocation to holiness and everyone has a duty to seek ways in which that primary vocation can be realized. I suggest that the Parish Evangelization Retreat and the subsequent involvement in small faith communities could be a part of that advancement in holiness. These retreats and the small faith communities could also be instruments to help assure that this Year of the Eucharist be one in which a spirit of wonder and awe is fostered. Perhaps Advent is that Season of Grace in which we begin to see anew wonderful possibilities. Fill us, Lord, with a spirit of genuine wonder and awe in Your Presence!

MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA                    December 2, 2004

The events of the week are both numerous and disconnected. Since I participated in the FaithWorks presentation at The Dalles on Monday night and since I was returning from Pendleton on Sunday, I did not get to the office until Tuesday. It was that day which constituted the only full day that I spent in the office in almost three weeks. After that one day I was not necessarily in need of a break but the coming of Thanksgiving and the need to travel to Jordan Valley for Confirmation gave me an excuse to travel down there a few days early, join parishioners for Thanksgiving dinner, do a little bird hunting, catch up on some correspondence, and recover from the effects of trying to keep up with energetic young-legged hunters. At least it wasn't on horse back! Sunday was Confirmation for the combined parishes of Saint Bernard at Jordan Valley and Holy Family at Arock. It is wonderful to have such a valid excuse for coming again to this Valley. Though I had spent some time down here this summer I did not see all that there was to see and on this trip I was treated to a ride down through Leslie Gulch. All I can say is that it was most spectacular and as I was chaperoned down the Gulch I could not help but wonder how I could make this remote Gulch a part of a day trip for visiting friends or relatives. I do know that I will be back to see it again and that I will make every effort to find a way to bring others here.
Friday after Thanksgiving found significant portions of Eastern Oregon blanketed or at least dusted with the first real signs of winter. In Jordan Valley the snow very lightly and gently wafted down throughout the day. It was one of those gray days; calm, not too cold, peaceful. A good day for a fire and a book; a good day for a nap. I heard on the radio the tales about people rushing to be the first in line at great department stores so as to be the first to lay claim to the announced, deeply discounted bargains. This I do not understand. It sounds like there are limited amounts of merchandise and once the inventory is exhausted so is the possibility of acquiring the desired item. It also sounds like the bargains and sales will only last for one day before pricing as usual returns. As you can readily see I am not necessarily a sale shopper. There was a time when I considered free or deeply discounted merchandise to be a real bargain but it did not take me very long to realize that even if something is free, if I did not really need it then it was already too expensive. I suspect that there are millions of dollars worth of merchandise sold on the traditional Friday after Thanksgiving which when inventoried consists largely of things no one truly needs and which would, under other circumstances, never be bought.
On the Catholic scene we are alerted four weeks prior to Christmas to help assure our proper spiritual preparation. I wish there would be a rush to begin the spiritual preparation comparable to that seen in the secular world. The four Sundays of Advent, preparatory as they are for Christmas, hardly ever produce anything resembling the Friday after Thanksgiving rush of Christmas preparation. The experience in many parishes is that the spiritual preparation for this wonderful Solemnity entails a great rush at the end of the Advent Season with numerous calls to the Parish as late as Christmas Eve itself inquiring about the times for Masses with an unfortunately low number inquiring about the possibility of a good Christmas confession. Hearing tales of avid shoppers waiting in line for several hours before a store is scheduled to open reminds me that where someone's heart is, there will their treasure be also. It is a season in which we see very clearly the distinction between the City of God and the City of Man. This is the season during which each of us must remember who we are and perhaps recall our Lord's prayer for us and for His disciples that while we must remain in the world we must strive not to become engrossed in or be absorbed by the world. There is no need to avoid the secular trappings of Christmas in their entirety but there is a need to assure that the secular trappings do not totally obscure or replace the abundant spiritual graces available during this Season of the Liturgical Year. It is this obscuring of genuine Christmas possibilities which always puts me in interior conflict during the Christmas Season. On the one hand I want to rejoice as actively as anyone in the festiveness of the Season but when that festiveness losses its connection with the God-Child who gives it meaning then I am instead genuinely distressed.
Sunday night, following the Confirmation at Jordan Valley and Arock I wended my way to Vale to participate in the FaithWorks presentation. This, the fourth of the series, is presented by the Office of Development and so my part is very nominal. Instead of talking for three hours I talk for about ten minutes and then turn the podium over to another. While I certainly enjoy making the presentations I do also appreciate the possibility of simply being an attendee.
Monday we begin an audited review of our efforts in the area of the protection of children. The National Office for the Protection of Children has arranged that every Diocese have its progress or lack thereof audited by impartial investigators to assure that all that can be done to help assure the safety of children is, in fact, being done. In my opinion we have been quite diligent in our efforts to assure that everyone who has contact with children is appropriately screened, that every priest who comes to serve, even temporarily, is carefully studied, that everyone who volunteers or is employed participates in the safe environment program and that all parents are afforded the opportunity, if they wish, to participate in the same program and even include their children, that we remain vigilant on behalf of children, that we remain committed to the prompt reporting of any incident involving children or young people and that prayer for healing remains a part of our daily regimen. As I have said before the perfect safety of all children, as desirable as such a goal might be, is very likely beyond our poor ability to achieve. We can, however, and must be very vigilant recognizing that we shall never know how many children may have been protected as a result of our efforts. I pray that children are in fact much safer as a result of our efforts, or at very least that we are all a bit more aware of the vigilance which each of us must exercise on their behalf.

MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA            November 24, 2005

This past weekend I had the opportunity to travel to Pendleton and to confer the Sacrament of Confirmation on the young people of Saint Mary's at Pendleton and Saint Helen's at Pilot Rock. In conjunction with this trip we offered the FaithWorks program on Stewardship and Accountability at Pendleton and at The Dalles. Since it is the Year of the Eucharist I am taking the opportunity to teach about the Most Holy Eucharist as the theme of the Confirmation talk. In the context of that sermon I reflect upon the Eucharist under three different aspects: The Sacrament of Presence, the Sacrament of Sacrifice and the Sacrament of Communion. Each time I make this presentation I become more and more committed to Our Lord in the Most Holy Eucharist. Each presentation reminds me very strongly of what the Holy Father has asked us to do this year and why it is so important. In the prayer over the candidates for Confirmation we find the line: “Give them a spirit of wonder and awe in your presence.” I have used this line dozens of times as I have confirmed hundreds of young people across the Diocese but this year these words have taken on a renewed significance. In some way these words have become for me the theme and the hope of the Year of the Eucharist.
I wonder when the last time was that any of us paused at the threshold of the Church and stood shockingly still reflecting on the fact that we were on the threshold of the house of the living God. When were any of us last filled with “a spirit of wonder and awe” as we entered into the Tabernacled Presence of our Eucharistic Lord. When were we last filled with “a spirit of wonder and awe” as we approached the table of the Lord to receive Him in Holy Communion. This is a spirit for which each of us is asked to pray during this special Year of the Eucharist-a spirit of wonder and awe in His Presence.
Years ago I had the opportunity to visit the Sistine Chapel in Rome. I actually visited it twice under two very different circumstances. The first time I saw this Chapel was in the ordinary course of the day in conjunction with hundreds of other milling tourists and sightseers. The Chapel is usually seen at the end of a lengthy visit to the Vatican Museum and is often automatically included in the visit to the Vatican Museum. Thus I arrived at the Chapel after it was already crowded with people who were excited, relatively noisy, and quite taken by the magnificence of the art for which the Chapel is known. I too was very taken by the scene of the creation of Adam, the Last Judgment, the magnificent presentations of the Prophets, the whole splendid display of art. Scattered throughout the Chapel were ushers who repeatedly shushed the crowd by calling out: “Silencio!!” Despite the best efforts of these ushers the noise would only subside for a moment or two and then begin to rise again until it became a deafening roar.
The second time I visited the Chapel was entirely different. Having learned from the Roman Seminarians that the experience of the Chapel could be quite different under different circumstances I accompanied one of them on another visit. This time we arrived very early so that we could be in the front of the ticket line and immediately upon entering the museum we literally ran through the museum to arrive at the Chapel about an hour before anyone else began to intrude upon our visit. The Chapel was literally, for me, an entirely different space. It was, in many ways, one of the most prayerful experiences of my life. In that moment I recognized why the Church has chosen this space as the place in which to elect the Pope. In that moment I felt the grandeur of the centuries of Popes elected there. The art, ceased to be art and became a faith experience. Adding silence to that Chapel transformed it from an extension of an art museum to a place of prayer. This is an experience of the Sistine Chapel which most tourists never have because very few have the opportunity, despite the efforts of the ushers, to experience it in silence. It is a place where one can readily be filled with a “spirit of wonder and awe in His Presence.” If we do not regularly experience our Lord with a spirit of wonder and awe it may be, in part, because we have not run ahead of the crowd to create the possibility of a quiet interlude with the Lord. I am sure that most tourists have no idea what they have missed about the Sistine Chapel. They perhaps even wonder why the Chapel is considered to be so wonderful. It is not only the Chapel but the Chapel experienced in silence which manifests its real beauty and its real power.
I propose a bit of a scientific experiment. I have speculated about this for years and I believe my theory has merit. Put on a set of headphones, turn of the volume relatively loud, close your eyes and have someone feed you different foods; perhaps peaches, apples, watermelon, onion. In my experience the sense of taste seriously diminishes as the noise level increases. I suspect our sense of God diminishes as well. If we are to reestablish in our lives a spirit of wonder and awe in God's Presence, silence will be required. The General Instruction on the Roman Missal points out that there are times for silence in the context of the Sacred Liturgy and that these are valuable and even essential for properly meeting the Lord in Liturgy. The Year of the Eucharist affords us a wonderful opportunity to experiment with larger blocks of silence in the context of the Sacred Liturgy. I wonder what the typical congregation would do with a full five minutes of reverent and awe full silence before our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament. Unfortunately there are some who would find it awful instead of awe full!!
I believe that our Churches must be places of wonder and awe. They are places of wonder and awe just as the Sistine Chapel is truly a place of wonder and awe but they can only be experienced as such when silence is included and when our own expectations are properly raised. Our Churches can be experienced as two different places depending on whether we experience them with silence or in its absence. May each of us be filled with a spirit of wonder and awe in God's presence especially during this Year of the Eucharist.

MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA        November 18, 2002

This last week was split between Nebraska and Washington, D.C. The D.C. trip was a part of the annual duty of the bishops of the United States to gather as an Episcopal Conference to discuss, discern and decide a number of matters which concern in a particular way the Catholic Church in the United States. The trip to Nebraska was mostly designed to spend some time at my home of origin and to see relatives and friends and in particular my mother. It was a good visit, gratefully uneventful, a bit short, inadequate in time to see all whom I would have liked to have seen, restful, peaceful, a good visit. The D.C. portion is just now beginning and so there is not much to report but I would like to reflect, at least a little, on the experience of the Conference itself. By Conference I do not mean the meeting as such but rather the collection of bishops from across the United States who come together to discuss the business of the Conference.
There may be some who look at the Conference as an agency to which individual bishops report or which exercises some supervisory responsibilities over individual bishops. Neither of these understandings are entirely correct. The Conference does often serve as a liaison between the Holy See and the bishops of the United States but it does not, in and of itself, exercise supervisory or governance authority over individual bishops. That is the function of the Holy See itself and the various Offices connected with the Holy See. For this reason the trip to Rome last June and the visits to the various Congregations provided a much stronger impression of being in contact with the Universal Church than this much more local gathering. In many ways one of the most inspiring moments of the conference is the address given to the bishops by the Papal Nuncio, Archbishop Gabriel Montalvo. He is the Holy Father's personal representative to the Catholic Church in the United States-his presence affirms the relationship between the Conference as a whole and the Holy Father. He provides for us that contact with the 'greater Church', reinforces for us the Holy Father's particular affection for us and assures us of our essential connection with the Church at Rome, the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. His presence reaffirms for us that we are not the American Catholic Church, as some would like to have us identified, but rather the Roman Catholic Church in America. Make no mistake about it, the verbal engineering employed in this regard is very deliberate and is intended to foster the impression of a very definitive distinction between the Roman Catholic Church and the American Catholic Church. The Conference is in no way, shape or fashion the 'Holy See' of the American Catholic Church, though there are some who seem to desire this to be the case.
It is certainly very good and rewarding to have the opportunity to gather with other bishops of the country, to share our experiences, to offer and receive mutual support and encouragement and to explore and discuss future pastoral initiatives. It is also very good to meet members of the Conference staff who do much of the 'behind the scenes' work of the Conference and to engage them in discussion. This happens, in particular, at the various committee meetings which are scheduled around the conference. As with other conferences, much of the good that happens is that which happens outside of the scope of the planned agenda. It is also an opportunity to meet with the leaders of various lay organizations who come to be present with and offer input to the bishops while they are all together in a single location. It may not be the best time for introductions but there is certainly ample opportunity at least to make some initial contact.
Believe it or not the meeting also offers the opportunity for much catching up on the latest episcopal speculation. Rumors of who could go where and when an announcement of a particular diocesan bishop can be expected are circulated. Of course, no one really knows and it is all idle speculation but it is interesting and only partially informative to hear the latest. It reminds me of various rumors which have been intentionally circulated around the Diocese of Baker in recent years. They have no foundation in fact but those are the hardest rumors to contradict because any protest is met with the rejoinder, “Thou dost protest too much!” When I hear wild rumors and speculation I am reminded of the passage, “Life is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.” How much this describes with great accuracy the life which rumors take on as their own. Rumors could perhaps be described as tales, told and retold by the informationally challenged, often full of sound and vehemence, signifying nothing. I do believe that we, as bishops, recognize this in the friendly banter which exchanges bwtween us and that we do not take either ourselves or our rumors too seriously. Unfortunately we are all prone to be affected to some extent by such rumoring and this is not good or healthy for those who hear or those who propagate the rumors.
The Conference plays a very important role in the life of the Church in the United States and offers some excellent information and even direction to individual bishops. The Conference, however, does not direct individual bishops in what they may or may not do within their own dioceses except in very rare and limited circumstances. Binding directions from the Conference, if they are to achieve the force of particular law for the bishops of the United States, must first receive what is known as a 'Recognitio' or confirmation from the Holy See. Thus the ecclesiology, which assigns a great deal of autonomy to an individual bishop in his own diocese, is preserved. This allows for a tremendous amount of legitimate diversity from one diocese to another and hopefully, for the most part, contributes to the universality of the Catholic Church without infringing upon its mark of unity or Oneness. It is, for all of its diversity, even in the United States, still, One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.

THE MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA        November 4, 2004

This week my schedule involved a bit more travel than average but fortunately the trip was broken by intervals and stops at parishes. The weekend was spent mostly in Harney County with Holy Family Parish in Burns as a base of operations. Saturday took me across the Time Zone into Mountain time for Mass and Confirmation at Saint Charles Parish in Juntura. This was preceded by a brief stop and a very substantial 2:00 (Pacific Time) lunch at Holy Family in Burns. Unbeknown to me there was also a very substantial dinner following the 4:00 PM (Mountain Time) Confirmation at Juntura. At Saint Charles there were seven young people confirmed and the claim was made that this was the first confirmation in that Parish since the 1930's. I have not verified this but it was the claim made by one of the students who had just been confirmed and far be it from me to question such a source. As is my routine I did question the confirmands at least a little and found them to be bright energetic and even animated at times. It was a delightful event. The unexpected dinner made lunch look like a snack and while I could not eat much because of the late lunch I did manage to make off with several canisters of various dishes which will tide me over for a long time to come.
The Confirmation at Juntura was followed immediately by Mass and Confirmation at 6:00 PM (Pacific Time) in Our Lady of Loretto Parish at Drewsey. There four youngsters were confirmed and once again a reception followed. This reception involved only cake and coffee but coming as it did on the heels of a potluck that had concluded less than two hours earlier I consented to only a moderate sized piece of cake. Here too the youngsters were very well catechized, bright and attentive.
The next morning, having returned to Holy Family for the night, Mass and Confirmation was held at Burns where thirty-one young ladies and gentlemen were the recipients of the Gift of the Holy Spirit. This event was followed by a breakfast hosted by the Knights of Columbus partially as a reception for the Youth but, as I understand it, a part of the regular activities of the Knights there. From the looks of the ease with which sausages were baked and pancakes grilled this was not a rare occasion for the Knights. They looked very much at home in the kitchen. As I celebrated Mass I was very impressed by the number of vibrant young families in the Parish and by the strength of the Catechetical Program. The fine group of High School Youth who sang with the choir were inspirational. I could not help but think, 'There are vocations to priesthood and religious life in this group.' I am convinced this is true. I saw similar quality and depth of Faith at each of the Missions; at Juntura, at Drewsey and at Crane, the next stop on the tour.
Crane, Saint Thomas Parish boasts of being the most recently established Parish of the Diocese and while the parish is small in numbers of parishioners it is not lacking in dedication. Here two students were confirmed which means all of the questions were directed at them. They did very well. I must admit, though, I could feel their catechists cringing as I asked questions which received either blank stares, questioning looks or tentative answers. There was nothing tentative, however, about the potluck dinner which followed this Mass and Confirmation. Once again the plates piled high and a delightful meal followed. What looked to be a superabundance of food was dwindled to a few remaining morsels, enough for a sandwich or two for the next day's lunch.
The days and visits to the Parishes were moments of grace for me and hopefully for all who attended over the weekend. I have taken as my theme for this year's sermon the Holy Father's announced Year of the Eucharist. This theme affords each of us an opportunity to reflect a bit more intensely throughout this year on the wonderful Gift and Mystery which wonderfully describes the Most Holy Eucharist. I have taken three elements of the Eucharist and briefly comment upon each. I teach about the Eucharist as the Sacrament of Presence, the Sacrament of Sacrifice and the Sacrament of Communion. Wise Catechists who read this column and are preparing children for Confirmation could spare their charges and themselves some anxious Confirmation moments by reviewing these Eucharistic concepts. As a part of the prayer over the candidates for confirmation the Bishop asks that the gifts of the Holy Spirit be showered down upon them. The bishop asks for wisdom and understanding for them. He asks for right judgment and courage and knowledge and reverence. Then the prayer concludes: “Fill them with the Spirit of wonder and awe in your presence.” This Spirit of wonder and awe in the Presence of the Lord is something which we need to recapture in our Americanized Liturgy and devotional practices.
In this regards I must again cite the Holy Father's beautiful letter, Mane Nobiscum Domine: “There is a particular need to cultivate a lively awareness of Christ's real presence, both in the celebration of Mass and in the worship of the Eucharist outside of Mass. Care should be taken to show that awareness through tone of voice, gestures, posture and bearing. In this regard, liturgical law recalls - and I myself have recently reaffirmed - the importance of moments of silence both in the celebration of Mass and in Eucharistic adoration. The way that the ministers and the faithful treat the Eucharist should be marked by profound respect. The presence of Jesus in the tabernacle must be a kind of magnetic pole attracting an ever greater number of souls enamored of him, ready to wait patiently to hear his voice and, as it were to sense the beating of his heart.”(18) Fill us all with a spirit of wonder and awe in your presence!
After the All Saints' Day Mass at Holy Family I was treated again to a breakfast meal, a bit more sparse than what the weekend had proffered, but delightful nonetheless. The selection of possible cereals was not quite what I had seen some years ago on a seminarian table but it was close. Then, I saw Captain Crunch, Fruit Loops and Cocoa Puffs, hardly the breakfast of champions. This round included several flavors of Honeycombs, Sugar Pops and Frosted Flakes. It was a weekend of prayerful reverence, fellowship, food and fun - all centered on the Lord. How delightful!!

 

THE MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA           September 23, 2004

There is an old axiom that it is not prudent to attempt to discuss either politics or religion. The Bishops of the United States have been accused of dabbling in both and of trying to inject religion into politics. This accusation is one to which we can and must plead guilty. The thought of keeping religion out of politics, while at first blush a prudent plan, fails the test of common sense. Who, for instance, now stands beside Pius XII and opines that he and the Church should have stayed even further from the 'politics' of the Third Reich. If I am not mistaken the current attacks on Pius XII are based precisely on the accusation that he did not do enough to deter the destructive political path of Germany. There is one case where more religion was needed in politics.
This past weekend the Diocese of Baker sponsored its third Annual Pro-Life Conference. It was a refreshing and invigorating event. Nationally known speakers including Dr. John Willke and Miss Janet Folger as well as local youth from Hood River and Klamath Falls were a part of the presenting team. The entire presentation will be available through the Chancery at Bend on DVD, audio and perhaps even VHS for slightly above the cost of materials. I would recommend that every parish pro-life committee take advantage of these presentations to further educate the people of the parish. There is a great danger that we, even dedicated Catholics, grow complacent and become a bit desensitized to the rampant destruction of innocent human life which goes on around us every day. There are no glaring headlines announcing how many babies have been killed in the past day. There are no news flashes when twins or triplets are aborted. This wholesale murder of innocent babies goes largely unreported and unnoticed. Conferences, such as the one held in Bend this weekend, are essential lest we all grow complacent and begin to think that these innocent human lives do not matter. There are many who would like us to believe that these lives have nothing to do with the current political processes but the political and religious reality is that human lives must always matter.
In conjunction with the Conference I was given a copy of Dr. Willke's book, “Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Past and Present”. In reading it I learned a lot. One of the most shocking things I learned was that physicians and psychiatrists in Germany had killed more than 275,000 non-Jewish German citizens, not because they had been ordered to do so by German authorities (Hitler) but solely because they were given the power to do so. Drawing from the war crimes trials we find that the disregard for human life in Germany did not start with Hitler. He certainly took advantage of that disregard when it came to the Jews but: “From the very beginning-that is, before the outbreak of war and before any written expression by Hitler-it was officially known to leading professors of psychiatry and directors of mental hospitals that under the designation of “euthanasia” a program was about to be carried through by them and with their help to kill mental patients in the whole of Germany. The object was “the destruction of life devoid of value.” That definition was flexible enough for a summary proceeding of extermination of patients.” Politics (or medicine) separated from religion produces a chilling result.
One might hope that such a program was carried out with great reluctance and chagrin but according to the records of the trial: “The individual psychiatric hospitals were not so squeamish about the number of patients put to death while the program lasted. For example, in 1941, the psychiatric institution Hadamar celebrated the cremation of the ten thousandth mental patient in a special ceremony. Psychiatrists, nurses, attendants, and secretaries all participated. Everybody received a bottle of beer for the occasion.” Politics and medicine devoid of religion, devoid of morality, produces disastrous results.
Pro-abortion politicians would have us believe that it is possible and even necessary to leave all religion and all morality outside of the political and medical arenas. This cannot be done. It has already been tried and the world will ever regret the horrible consequences of that dismally destructive social experiment. The unfortunate label of the “assisted suicide state” has already been applied to Oregon. Dr. Leo Alexander, a medical expert at the Nuremberg medical trials, noted: “Whatever proportions these crimes finally assumed, it became evident to all who investigated them that they had started from small beginnings. The beginnings at first were merely a subtle shift in emphasis in the basis attitude of the physicians. It started with the acceptance of the attitude, basic in the euthanasia movement, that there is such a thing as a life not worthy to be lived.” Oregon law now officially recognizes that there is such a thing “as a life not worthy to be lived.”
Two other rather sobering comments are found from the trials: Justice Robert Jackson, chief counsel for the United States at Nuremberg wrote: “A freedom-loving people will find in the records of the war crimes trials instruction as to the roads which lead to such a regime and the subtle first steps that must be avoided.” Even more striking is the “judgment of a Frankfurt court about a psychiatrist who not only killed many patients-adults and children-personally, but also watched their death agonies through the peep window of the gas chambers. “We deal,” said the court “with a certain human weakness which does not as yet deserve moral condemnation.””
At what point will we in the United States recognize that practically this same statement could be used to refer to our, even Catholic, legislators and political leaders who show a consistent and determined disregard for the sanctity of innocent human life, refuse to stand up for those pre-born lives and publicly proclaim that they will do all in their power to see to it that this wanton destruction of human life continues. Do we too believe that in this “We deal with a certain human weakness which does not as yet deserve moral condemnation”?

THE MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA            September 16, 2004

The week's travels took me to Chicago, Portland, Pendleton, Elgin, Vale and back to Bend. This grand round was necessitated by an Extension Society meeting in Chicago, an Oregon Catholic Conference meeting in Portland, a stopover stay at Pendleton on the way to Elgin for a portion of a Parish Evangelization Retreat and a Sunday afternoon trip to Vale for the second of five presentations on Life Issues.
I probably need to begin with last week because that week ended at Pendleton with a FaithWorks presentation on Life Issues. FaithWorks is the diocesan adult education program I have embarked upon and this quarter's topic is Life Issues. I have found that one of the best global presentations of Life Issues is found in the Catechism of the Catholic Church and the presentation of three hours is drawn almost exclusively from that source. In the course of the presentation, already given at Pendleton and Vale, we touch on the issues of murder, health, embryonic stem cell research, capital punishment, self defense, just war theory, risk taking, organ donation, contraception and, of course, abortion. One theme that has arisen in the presentation is that of the politician's responsibility to foster and promote the common good. This promotion of the common good is the reason for laws. In fact, a definition of law is, “An ordinance of reason, promulgated by one with proper authority for the promotion of the common good”. Thus, the very reason why lawmaking authority is entrusted to legislators is so that the common good may be promoted.
Obviously the question that needs to be answered concerns the nature of this “common good”. To whose “good” does this term apply? The “common good” cannot be that which is individually good and beneficial for me without any reference at all to other potential beneficiaries of that “good”. The modifier “common” is very significant. It does not mean ordinary or routine as one would talk about a very “common” piece of furniture. It comes rather from the word “communio” or community and refers to that body of persons who reside in a particular community. Thus the “common” or community good is that which promises to provide the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of people without jeopardizing fundamental rights to life, liberty or pursuit of happiness. The ”common good” is that which is good for the community as a whole.
Furthermore these goods are arranged in a necessary hierarchy. Life precedes liberty, liberty precedes pursuit of happiness. The genuine promotion of the “common good” cannot exist without a clear and consistent recognition that the right to life is the preeminent good which is to be sought, promoted and preserved. It is this good upon which the others rest. Since politicians are 'hired' for the express purpose of promoting this “common good” they fail severely if they do not actively promote that good of life for all of the citizens entrusted to them. Since we recognize, in accord with the Catechism, that life begins at conception, every politician, especially those who profess the Catholic faith, are bound to pursue this good of life for these unrecognized, pre-born citizens as well as for every other citizen of this country. This the Catechism clearly teaches: “From the first moment of his existence (conception), a human being must be recognized as having the rights of a person-among which is the inviolable right of every innocent being to life”. At very least, every Catholic politician must recognize this life and determine to work in the political arena for the promotion of the “community good”; a community with includes pre-born persons and a good which includes life. A politician who disavows any responsibility to work for the recognition of the genuine and incontrovertible rights of any significant portion of this community, born or pre-born, is very difficult to support.
Later in the week we encountered another political 'hot potato” at the Oregon Catholic Conference. Measure 36, which seeks an Oregon Constitutional Amendment to define marriage as a union between one man and one woman, was discussed. There is no hesitancy on the part of the advisors or the Bishops to affirm that this definition is to be supported. The fuller discussion of this topic will be provided in a number of venues and I cannot treat it extensively here. There are clear moral and public policy ramifications of our support. I will only state here that marriage is a very specific institution and while other relationships may imitate it or vaguely resemble it or claim to be its equivalent or seek the rights and privileges connected with it, the reality is that those relationships are all different from marriage in essential ways and ought not to be legislatively or judicially declared identical to marriage or, indeed, to be marriage itself. Things which are different should not be declared to be the same.
Besides Portland I also spent a couple of days in Chicago where there was a meeting of the Catholic Extension Society. This Society has been extremely supportive of 'mission' Dioceses in the United States, of which we are one. There are many Churches in our Diocese which have been built with the assistance of, or even exclusively by, contributions from the Catholic Extension Society. This organization, now celebrating one hundred years of service, continues to be very important for the Diocese of Baker. We rely very heavily upon their ongoing contributions and I would be remiss if I did not remind the people of the Diocese to pray with great gratitude for the many benefactors throughout our country who have helped and continue to help us in this truly mission land. In some ways our gratitude is expressed in our prayers but we also express gratitude by looking at our own resources and seeking to find ways to 'match' the generosity of those outside our Diocese with our own. There are many needs to which others have contributed over the years and we too have likewise contributed to these. We continue to ask them for increased generosity to us through Catholic Extension and thus we must also look to our own parishioners, to ourselves, for the resources needed to continue to work in this mission land. The Bishop's Annual Appeal is scheduled for October and I might suggest this as an opportunity to show a generosity to others similar to the generosity shown to your Parish by others.

THE MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA            September 9, 2004

The travel schedule for the week was a bit more aggressive than those of the previous summer weeks but the trips were each very interesting and oddly connected. I suspect you will understand what I mean as I go through the week. I made a couple of short trips to a piece of property outside of Bend which is of interest to me because of its possible use as a future Catholic Spirituality Center. It is a bit of a distant dream but every dream must begin somewhere and in this case it begins with looking at a piece of land and trying to envision what could be developed there, how it would suit the needs of the Diocese and how to proceed with the stages of planning. There are certainly no immediate building plans but I do hope to keep looking and discussing the needs and possibilities.
I also traveled to La Pine to visit the Saint Vincent de Paul Society store which has been operative there for more than twenty years. The Society provides a very well run thrift store and food distribution center and I wanted to meet, greet and commend the many volunteers and employees who work so hard to provide services for the needy of the area. The zeal and dedication of these hard working folks is truly edifying and humbling. They are doing the Lord's work and they do it well. It is not an easy job and there too it was very obvious that the needs out-span the resources. There is need for additional space which may require additional land and both additional land and space require additional resources and the beauty of this organization is that they have no resources because a very large portion of what they earn at the store they give away to the poor. If they would simply keep what they earned at the store they would have money to build a bigger building and even purchase more land. Unfortunately, if they did that, then they would be failing in their mission to serve the poor. A generous grant would be welcomed. They, like the Diocese have hopes and dreams but lack the needed resources.
On this trip I decided not to drive and took advantage of the old saw: Let George do it. So George drove. We encountered a hitchhiker and since there were two of us and we were going to visit a place that serves the poor we could hardly drive past and not offer a ride. The man was fascinating. He was from Australia and he made Crocodile Dundee sound like a midwesterner. Everyone was 'mate' and on the brief trip he regaled us of stories of the Australian outback across which he drives a truck train. He said, “Aye, mate, I'm not talkin' about these little tonka trucks you call semis. I'm talkin' a real truck!” The 'train' according to his description is comprised of a forty foot tractor followed by seven forty-seven foot trailers. The outback highway is a straight dirt road over which they travel, in a caravan of seven trains, at a rate of a hundred miles per hour. The story may be suitable for another episode of Ripley's. He was here on vacation and claims to have been robbed at a train station and was just now traveling to Los Angeles to the Embassy to get a new passport and exit papers and head back home. He found America quite unfriendly and was quite vocal about his love for the outback.
Later that same day I went to a brief presentation in support of a nationwide prayer initiative called, 'America Needs Fatima'. A gentleman, Nicholas, travels with a beautiful Fatima statue and briefly tells the Fatima story and recounts the messages of Mary. Essentially the message is to persevere in fasting, prayer and penance for the conversion of sinners and especially to pray the rosary. Those familiar with the rosary will be familiar with the Fatima addition: O my Jesus, forgive us our sins, save us from the fires of hell. Lead all souls to heaven especially those most in need of Thy mercy. In spite of the fact that he has dedicated sixteen years of his life as an unpaid, but meagerly supported, volunteer he too was robbed the night before having some personal items and a portion of his sound equipment stolen. Two travelers, two thefts. He too was inspiring for his dedication to Mary and to the apostolate of prayer.
I took a day to travel to Crane to spend a part of a day on a horse in the hills chasing cattle. It was a great day and mercifully shorter than my last equestrian outing. I bring up Crane because of a new sign and an odd connection. The sign reads: Welcome to Crane the gateway of the Oregon outback. I thought of my Aussie traveler and thought of his possible reaction: 'Mate, this may be the outback to you but its more like a back yard to me.'
I needed to be at Saint Andrew's in Pendleton on Sunday morning and so I drove from Crane to Pendleton and on the way met another traveler of the road and so gave him a lift from Long Creek to Pendleton. He too, or so he said, had been robbed. I think he may have been telling the truth because he said he had been robbed at a bar and it was quite obvious that he had been at a bar. Since I had just been on a horse I was incognito and so I did get an unreserved earful about the evils of the Catholic Church and a variety of other societal wrongs. He was one in need of assistance and what he needed more than anything else was AA. I mostly listened and when we got to Pendleton, I gave him some cookies, a little money, a sleeping bag and a little advice. I told him I was a Catholic priest that God still loved him, that his church would welcome him if he came back with a desire for sobriety and that he had a chance to make his life better. I pray he remembers a little bit of kindness and may eventually find his way to peace.
At Saint Andrew's, after the Confirmation of two young men, I took a more thorough tour of the parish gronds. I was struck by the beauty of the setting. It was as if I had never really looked at it before. I have always been aware of the needs of the facilities and the challenges posed to the pastor but I never really considered the possibilities which those facilities offer. I became convinced that this place could and possibly should be very extensively used by the Diocese. It may even be an ideal setting for our Diocesan youth retreats and camps. Many of the same thoughts I had while looking at a piece of property outside of Bend came to mind. I tried to envision what could be developed there, how it would suit the needs of the Diocese and how to proceed with the stages of planning. There are certainly no immediate renovation plans but I do hope to explore the needs and possibilities.

THE MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA            September 3, 2004

These latter days of August have been wonderful days. There have been a few sunsets which have rivaled in beauty the most splendid I can remember. There has come upon the grasslands a subtle change of hue and color which makes even very poor land look rich. The mountains which had lost their snow covered beauty have begun to be once again 'robed in majesty'. In parts of Eastern and Central Oregon there are still various harvests underway and so there is an occasional golden wheat field on its way to golden stubble. That one more and possibly last cutting of alfalfa promises hay for yet another winter. Soon flights of waterfowl will be seen overhead and those inclined to hunt will be scoping out game trails and haunts for the best place to establish a stand. At Enterprise in the Wallowa Mountains there was some talk of the upcoming deer and elk season but it appears that these will be safe from any attempts on my part to add to my freezer. In one, almost certainly exaggerated, report there was a herd of 300 deer feeding in a rancher's alfalfa field just a little way from town. Where is Ripley when you need him?
Enterprise, in the valley of the Wallowa River, sits at the foot of the Wallowa Mountains which form a marvelous backdrop to each of the little towns in the valley. The Lostine River joins the Wallowa near the town of Lostine and both Prairie Creek and Hurricane Creek likewise feed into the Wallowa. The prized feature of the area, however, in the beautiful glacial lake of the same name as its out-flowing river. I did not have the opportunity to drive to the lake this trip but I did resolve to do so on one of my future trips to the area. As I drove up to Enterprise, where some members of the Diocesan staff and lay recruits were presenting a Parish Evangelization Retreat, I listened to the autobiography of Saint Therese of Lisieux on tape. I was familiar with most of it but I had never taken the time to read or listen to her story from beginning to end. There were and are many wonderful spiritual lessons to be learned from this Little Flower of Jesus. What particularly struck me as I approached the Wallowa Mountains was Therese's reflection on the grandeur of the Swiss Alps which she observed on her pilgrimage to Rome when she was just about to turn fifteen years of age. She was going to Rome, ostensibly on a pilgrimage, but her hidden desire was to ask the Pope directly to give her permission to enter a Carmelite Monastery at the age of fifteen. Observing the beauty and grandeur of the Alps she reflected on how, if her wish was granted, she would never again look upon such beauty for as long as she lived. She further reflected that this view of God's grandeur could well serve to remind her, at least in an imitative way, of the future glory of heaven when the walls of Carmel began to confine and restrict her. She rejoiced in the beauty of the Alps but her rejoicing was much more centered on the God who made them and whose beauty they reflected than on the mountains themselves.
I am certain that the residents of Wallowa County take great pride in their mountain. I am sure you recall they also boast that there is not a single stop light in the entire County. In fact, while giving one of the talks I mentioned that they were most fortunate to live in such a grand area with its splendid view of the mountains. They simply answered, “We know.” I pray that all the residents likewise know the God who made these marvels, the God who speaks gently to them in these marvels and the God who summons them to Himself as they feel summoned to the hills themselves.
This is the second Retreat we have offered at Saint Katherine Parish in Enterprise and I am certain that it will not be the last. Those who have attended the Retreat have found in its presentation and spirituality a beautifully clear and refreshing pool. They have been refreshed and renewed by this weekend with the Lord. Furthermore the local promoters have taken it upon themselves to spread this 'good news'. They are not afraid to proclaim the beauty and refreshing nature of their Wallowa Mountains and Wallowa Lake and they have not been shy about proclaiming the beauty and refreshing nature of the Parish Evangelization Retreat. This is one of the very few places in the Diocese that has actively pursued the Chancery staff to come back to the Parish and offer a second Retreat. In fact, the promoters in Wallowa and Enterprise first attended the Retreat at Saint Mary in Pendleton and immediately, even before the Retreat was ended, were petitioning to have the Retreat presented at Enterprise. I can only conclude that, living at the base of the Wallowas, these folks know a good thing when they see it.
In some ways the residents are a bit reticent about the Wallowa Mountains and its adjoining glacial lake. It almost seems that they prefer to keep it just a bit of a secret for fear that it will be overrun with tourists who could well disturb the tranquility of the area which is as delightful as the mountains themselves. Gosh, they may even have to put up a stop light. The Catholics there, however, are not reticent about their commitment to the Parish Evangelization Retreat. Several of them even had to make the commitment to actually give a talk at the Retreat and they did a superb job. The Retreat is ultimately intended to be an event that can be sponsored by parishioners, promoted by parishioners, presented by properly prepared parishioners and which can lead to the renewal, indeed, to the creation, of a genuine evangelizing sprit in the parishes of the Diocese.
I have no doubt that God can be found on the trails and in the vistas as one works his way up Hurricane Creek. I am convinced, however, that the message of love and salvation needs to be very clearly expressed and experienced. The message of God's existence and presence is beautifully proclaimed by the Mountains of Wallowa and the message of love and salvation is wonderfully and touchingly proclaimed in the Parish Evangelization Retreats. The Wallowa Mountains, Wallowa Lake and the Evangelization Retreat are a bit remote and take some time and energy to discover but those who try are richly rewarded.

THE MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA        August 12, 2004

Whether the time spent in and near Jordan Valley would qualify as a vacation or as a retreat or as a segment of 'Survivor' would certainly be debatable. It was, however, very good. I did not get to see all of the sights I had hoped and intended to visit but then when do we ever accomplish all that we initially intend and hope to accomplish. Besides I am now convinced that I have left enough unseen to justify another venture back to the southeast of Oregon. During my time there I was only able to make about four day long outings while resting on intervening days or doing some maintenance at the local parish. I found that combination of recreation, rest and work to be most refreshing.
The territory is rugged. If you look in the dictionary under 'rugged' you find a picture of the Owyhee River Canyons. Forebodingly rugged. Beautiful for its ruggedness. It is also, as you could readily guess, quite remote. One day I drove down (actually up river) but south to Three Forks Recreation area. The thirty five miles of slightly twisted, highly dusty, narrow dirt and sometimes graveled road culminated in an even narrower, more rugged, more twisted two mile stretch from the canyon rim to the river below. Absolutely desolate with a river through it. At this point there are several forks of the Owyhee River which come together, hence the name. Brief hikes down the river canyon or up one of the forks is enough to convince a prudent man that he needs to be better prepared before wandering too far in either direction. Definitely worth another longer look, a more serious block of time and better preparations.
It was very interesting visiting with the long term residents. There are folks who are now in the high 80's and mid 90's who were born in Jordan Valley. The territory is now quite tame and civilized by comparison to the land of their youth. Sheep ranching and mining were the driving economic forces in those earlier years and now both of those are gone. These have been replaced by cattle ranching and haying which are now the major industries of the area. In this rugged and dry area these are labor intensive occupations.
I spent one full day, about ten hours, on a horse tagging along as a rancher rounded up some stray 'weaners', that is, calves which either were or should have been weaned from their mothers and separated for further feeding and marketing. I was not entirely clear about the exact purpose or nature of our outing because there was a lot that was presumed. It was presumed for instance that I understood the geographical relationship between one pasture and another with one intervening. It was also presumed that I had some sense of what direction we headed off into and what direction constituted 'going home'. It was presumed that I had some idea of which markings on the cows related to the herd we were interested in and which belonged to the neighbors. I can tell you in all honesty and humility that I only figured out a very small portion of what we were supposed to be doing out there on the range. Besides being quite confused, which I tried to hide, I was also rather saddle battered which I could not hide. I have had about 12 previous hours on a horse a couple of years ago and significant parts of my anatomy are not well accustomed to the saddle. My greenhorn status was difficult to hide. There is a mystery involved in riding horses. As I watched others ride and even trot and gallop it appeared to me that horse and rider both went up or down at approximately the same time. This produced a ride which was neither teeth rattling nor bone jarring. My horse and I were not that well synchronized. As I explained to the rancher, It seems that when I am going up, the horse is going down and then when I am on the way down here comes the horse to greet me with increasingly painful results. Fortunately the horse mostly walked and that is quite comfortable and manageable. I think I could really get to like horse back riding particularly in the rugged territory of southeast Oregon. The prospect of ever actually doing enough riding to become even moderately proficient does not seem, however, too likely.
There were little adventures and challenges connected with the vacation but as I reflect on the time I realize anew that the one journey we are all involved in, the most interesting and in some ways difficult and challenging journey, is the inner one. Jordan Valley provides a great place for that journey but it is not necessarily about a journey to Three Forks or to Jordan Craters or Coffee Pot or Teakettle or South Mountain or Leslie Gulch or the Honeycombs; the work to be done is internal. The solitude and the quiet are essential components which facilitate the asking of difficult questions about the self but they do not replace those questions. The desolation of the area removes many distractions and clears away many non-essentials but the mind can still be cluttered with lots of 'stuff' and concerns about non-essentials. There is a clarity about a day in the desolate landscape. I had my walking stick, sufficient water and a can of beans. I was set for the day. It was all I needed. It was a good day.
Perhaps, back in the 'real' world, there are a few more concerns and anxieties and needs and wants. It is easy to get caught up in those. Out in the desolate, it was clear that no one but me was responsible for the choices I made and the consequences of those choices. If I wondered off the trail and got lost and ran out of water I could blame all kinds of folks. I could blame the person who wrote the fuzzily marked guide book, the ranger responsible for marking the trail, the previous hiker who had left confusing markings, the plastic company which made inferior plastic resulting in a leaky bottle, the faulty compass, the weatherman who said it was supposed to be cooler, and the list goes on. Out there, none of that matters, you are responsible. Inside the same is very true. My discontent, anger, bitterness, hurt, jealousy, disillusionment, sin, self centeredness, pride, ego, lack of faith, lack of joy can find many people and things outside of myself to blame but in the final analysis, I am responsible. A day of recollection each month is recommended for the active worker. A more regular day in the desolate sounds very attractive right now. It is probably necessary. It is a good way to discover who is responsible and to rediscover what we really need.

THE MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA        July 15, 2004

The topic of the visit with the Holy Father has aroused some interest particularly since I did opine about what I might say to the Holy Father. This gives rise to the question of what I actually did say or more importantly what he said. There were two opportunities for the Bishops of the Northwest to meet with the Holy Father. One was individual and private the other was a meeting of all the Bishops as a group with the Holy Father.
The first, the individual and private meeting, is designed as an opportunity to make a very brief oral report on the State of the Diocese. Since a longer written report had been prepared and sent six months earlier this meeting is, in the ideal order, intended to allow an opportunity for the Holy Father to ask questions and to seek clarifications. He did have in his hand a one page summary of what I presumed to be Diocesan statistics; size of the Diocese, number of parishioners, number of priests, number of religious, number of seminarians. We were instructed about the proper protocol for entering the Holy Father's presence, kneeling to kiss his ring, proper address and the like. While the ancient custom of kissing the Holy Father's ring may seem a bit antiquated it is amazing how natural and 'right' the gesture feels. One is almost automatically drawn to that response upon coming to pay a visit to the Successor of Saint Peter. After kissing his ring and presenting him a gift of a pearl rosary from an Oregon family I mentioned to him how much the people of America, especially the young people, respected, admired and loved him. I expressed my personal gratitude to him for being the Pope of my priesthood and for the many marvelous Pastoral Letters and Encyclicals he has authored.
Unfortunately it is obvious that it takes a tremendous amount of energy on the part of the Holy Father to engage in even very simple conversations. I talked a little about Eastern Oregon, its rural nature, its expansive territory and its few Catholics. One cannot mention Oregon to the Holy Father without acknowledging that it is the assisted suicide State. His one word question which followed as simply: Vocations? I explained how we have very few priests, a number of priests from other countries, the missionary nature of the Diocese, and a small number of seminarians. I expressed our need for more seminarians particularly from the Hispanic community but especially from our own parishes and families of Eastern Oregon. He simply nodded and paused and then asked another brief question: Family life, is good? I explained that the rural and agricultural nature of the Diocese served as a very healthy background for strong family life but that the secular influences of our society have very definite negative effects. In this regard I especially noted that the greatest needs I saw were for evangelization and catechesis, not only among the un-churched but first and almost more importantly among those who are already Catholic. His next question was simply: Mass attendance, is good? Here I had to admit that I did not have accurate figures but my sense was that Mass attendance while sincere was also sometimes sporadic. I pointed out that those who attended regularly were very dedicated to the Mass and very involved in the Parish. In this sense Mass attendance is very strong. On the other hand, I noted that there seems to be a kind of ambivalence about the seriousness of the obligation and need to attend Mass every Sunday. He concluded by simply saying: Thank you for your report.
Once more I knelt to kiss his ring, expressed again my affection for him, thanked him for the opportunity to meet with him and asked for his blessing. He gave me his blessing and the visit was concluded.
The General Meeting with all the Bishops of the Northwest involved primarily an address by one of the Bishops of the Northwest and a brief address by the Holy Father. The theme chosen by the Holy Father was the need for Catholics and Catholic Institutions to uphold and clearly teach authentic Catholic Doctrine. He insisted, as he has done on other occasions, “that the Church's institutions be genuinely Catholic; Catholic in their self understanding and Catholic in their identity.” These Institutions, whether they be Catholic grade schools, high schools, colleges or universities are the point of contact between the Church and our culture. In some ways this is especially true of Catholic Hospitals. It is through them that we, as Catholics, exercise the primary mission of the Church, that of evangelizing the culture. This evangelization takes place not only through these institutions but through the Catholicity of the lives of each member of the Church. The Holy Father said: “In addition to the personal testimony of faith and holiness for which individual believers are responsible by virtue of their baptism, the Church is also called to give an important institutional testimony before the world.” Individuals and institutions need to give testimony to the truth.
The Holy Father continued: “For this reason, the Risen Lord's command to make disciples of all nations and to teach them “to carry out everything I have commanded you” (Mt 28:19-20) must be the indispensable reference point for every activity of the Church.”
He addressed the Church's educational institutions in particular, noting: they “will be able to contribute effectively to the new evangelization only if they clearly preserve and foster their Catholic identity. This means that the content of the education they impart should make constant reference to Jesus Christ and his message as the Church presents it in her dogmatic and moral teaching.” Schools need to give testimony to the truth.
The Holy Father singled out specific issues about which we need to be boldly Catholic. While he did specifically reference these relative to institutions the inference can be made that those individuals associated with these institutions likewise need to think and act fully in accordance with the Gospel. “This will demand constantly re-examining their priorities in the light of their mission and offering convincing witness, within a pluralistic society, to the Church's teaching, particularly on respect for human life, marriage and family, and the right ordering of public life.”

 

MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA                 July 9, 2004

 Those who know me well will attest that it is most rare for me to reveal my personal plans in any kind of open fashion. This week will serve as a departure from that general tendency for the simple reason that my brain is tired and I am really focused on some genuine pure and simple vacation time. I feel a little like the trail horse that knows well where the barn is, how close it is and cannot help but run those last meters despite the valiant attempts of the novice rider to rein in the steed. In other words, I am genuinely looking forward to a couple of weeks without definitive schedules, deadlines, duties, responsibilities, commitments and hopefully contentions.

The next logical question, which people seem constitutionally unable to refrain from asking, is, “Where are you going and what are you going to do?” Generally, my need for privacy inclines me to respond, “That is not any of your concern.” All right, those who know me well also know that the true response is, “That’s none of your business.”

Well, despite the fact that it really is none of your business, and maybe even that you really do not care, I am going to tell you. Before I get to true vacation, I travel this weekend to The Dalles for confirmation and first Communion for the children of Hispanic migrant workers, who are in the area working on the cherry harvest. Each year a priest and a team of young catechists come to us from Kansas and spend a couple of weeks working with the young people who travel with their families as they follow the various harvests.

The two weeks of more intensive preparation is not a substitute for ongoing formation and catechesis, but it does make the sacraments of Christian initiation available for these itinerant workers. It also provides me with an opportunity to visit the worker camps, welcome them to the diocese and participate at least minimally in the catechetical formation. At very least I have the opportunity to address one sermon to them and the privilege of confirming them. I have come to look forward with joy to this occasion.

Immediately following the confirmation, I will travel to Hells Canyon on the Snake River, where the bishops of the Northwest will celebrate, as is our custom, the Fourth of July. This year the festivities include, or rather are centered on, a powerboat trip up and down the Snake River. It is a bit of adventure that I am eagerly anticipating. While floating on the rolling ocean tends to cause me considerable gustatory distress, trips such as this, as far as I can recall, cause me no such difficulties. The topological map of Oregon indicates that Hells Canyon is the deepest vertical canyon in the United States with an average depth of 6,600 feet. The Grand Canyon boasts of being a mile wide and a mile deep, but Hells Canyon is deeper. I look forward to seeing it from the bottom up.

Someone commented that it is a bit incongruous for the bishops of the Northwest to spend vacation time in Hells Canyon, and with this I must agree. It was very interesting in Rome, where we visited various Papal Offices (Congregations), that the cardinals were intrigued by the notion that the bishops would be going on a “raft trip,” to Hells Canyon no less. For the most part, it was not the kind of thing they would tend to do. The standard reply was that we were bishops of the Northwest. That seemed to be sufficient explanation.

That, however, is not my vacation. It perhaps is not even the prelude to my vacation. My plan and desire is to go to the parish in Jordan Valley and live there for three weekends, just over two weeks. Beyond daily Mass and prayer, I hope to take daily hikes and perhaps a series of day trips to lava flows, canyons, mountains, ranches and rivers. Solitude vacation retreats such as this are extremely valuable for me. I have not yet decided which spiritual books will accompany me, but I do have a couple in mind. I may do a little fishing if the opportunity presents itself, but then again I may not. That is the real beauty of a solitude vacation; it is devoid of any and all pressure to do or accomplish or see or complete anything. While I know myself well enough to understand that there will be some “projects” I will find to be done in the parish, my vacation will certainly not be dominated or consumed by these. Perhaps it will be as the old cowboys say: “I eats when I’ze hungry and I sleeps when I’ze tired.”

You may wonder what is so attractive about the Jordan Valley area that I would choose to spend two weeks’ vacation time there. The answer is a bit confusing even to me. I wanted it to be a place where it may be hard for me to live. It is its very remoteness and its “hardness” that draw me there. For me, vacation is always intimately tied to prayer and spiritual rejuvenation. For this reason, I do not really consider vacation so much in terms of recreation as retreat. Whether I walk toward the lava beds or the river or the mountains, what I really am seeking is solitude and a deeper appreciation of solitude. Like most, I do find myself gravitating toward distractions such as TV, radio, popular books, extended phone calls and perhaps worst of all for me, simply work. For this reason, I choose a very remote post of the diocese where there are fewer ready distractions.

My hope is that by spending this vacation time there with much time for prayer, silence and solitude, I will truly receive wonderful things from God; refreshment in body, mind and spirit. Perhaps the same could be achieved at a condominium on the coast, but that prospect does not draw me. I have wanted to spend time in Jordan Valley since I first arrived here, and now I am going to indulge this wish.

I have friends who want to come and visit, and I have proposed that they join me in Jordan Valley for at least a few days, but after a bit of hemming and hawing they have indicated a stronger preference for some other venue. So to accommodate them, I will try to spend a few days at the coast, hopefully catch my two-day limit of salmon and complete my vacation with a bit of pure recreation. I am looking forward to the days. I am looking forward to Jordan Valley and the weekends with the fine folks there; I am looking forward to the coast; I am looking forward to what God has in store for me. I believe with my whole heart that it is more than I can imagine. Isn’t that a great vacation to look forward to? Ah, perhaps our tastes differ.

MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA            June 25, 2004

The week just completed was spent in Denver at the annual June meeting of Bishops where, among many other things, the Bishops prepared a statement concerning Catholics in public life. More specifically the Bishops attempted to give an answer to the question of whether it is appropriate for Catholic politicians who consistently support and endorse pro-choice or pro-abortion positions to continue to receive Holy Communion. Very specifically the question was asked whether the denial of Holy Communion is ”necessary because of their public support for abortion on demand.” The view ultimately accepted by the body of Bishops was that such a denial was not necessarily “necessary” but such a denial was certainly possible and permissible, if, in the judgment of the local ordinary, it was deemed “the most prudent course of pastoral action.” The Conference found itself in a delicate situation. On one hand there was an obvious desire to support those Bishops who have made the pastoral judgment that further dialogue with certain pro-abortion and pro-choice politicians was ineffective and that their continued reception of Holy Communion was incompatible with the teachings of the Church as well as scandalous to the faithful. On the other hand there was a desire and a necessity of respecting the episcopal authority and responsibility of the local Bishop who prudentially determines that such a denial would be counterproductive in his particular case.
Those Bishops who have acted to restrict access to Holy Communion have been publicly criticized. Those Bishops who have chosen not to pursue this path have been publicly criticized. Neither criticism, nor lack of it, is ultimately the motive for the actions of individual Bishops. I am convinced we all want to do the right thing, we all want an end to abortion on demand in our country. There is great divergence, however, between Bishops and even between members of diverse actively pro-life organizations as to the 'best' methodology for achieving this desired goal. The Bishops recognize the need to continue to teach clearly and unceasingly of the need for legal protections for the pre-born. We recognize the grave responsibility we have to strive to persuade, especially Catholic and Christian politicians, of the centrality of the pre-born human life issues. We recognize the need to carry on these two activities ever more effectively with our Catholic people who are called to engage the culture and bring Catholic and Christian values to the public arena. Denying Holy Communion to a pro-abortion Catholic politician may seem like effective action, I wish it were an effective method of achieving conversion and change of heart, but unless there is a change of heart that politician continues to act in a way which supports and cooperates with the evil of abortion. Thus while denial of Holy Communion, and the preceding dialogue, is an action I would prefer, I must recognize that there are other, perhaps even more effective, ways of achieving a suitable protection of pre-born human life in our country.
It seems to me that the most effective way to end abortion is to vote for Pro-Life candidates. This is not a function of the Bishops, we have only one vote each, but rather a function of the laity who must be convinced of the power of their own vote and of their ability through the ballot box to effect a good or to perpetuate an evil. Unfortunately that vote has always been split between a multiplicity of 'goods', and with good reason, there are many 'goods' for our society which need to be politically pursued. We see such things as care for the poor, adequate housing, healthcare, education, economic prosperity, foreign policy and we hear the various political promises of how effectively these things are going to be managed by the members of one party or the other. These are tremendously significant human rights and human dignity issues about which we must certainly be conscientious. It would be evil and wrong to omit or to significantly neglect them. The persons who are the recipients of this assistance, however, already have that right upon which the other inalienable rights, liberty and pursuit of happiness, are based. They already have life. The quality of that life certainly needs to be upgraded and improved and as Christians we have a responsibility to work for those improvements. It seems there are many in our society, religious and non-religious alike, Democrat and Republican, who work and act on behalf of these persons. To some extent, however limited, these persons are even able to vote and speak and seek assistance for themselves. This is not true of the pre-born. They have no voice but yours and mine, they have no vote but yours and mine. If we do not vote for those who will act on their behalf, they have no other recourse. The Courts routinely recognize those who suffer but the Courts have refused to even recognize the existence of these most vulnerable of the neglected in our society. We need legislators who will propose and confirm justices who recognize with us the inviolable dignity of the pre-born human person. These have no voice but ours, they have no vote but ours. I, for one, will speak on behalf of all the needy and especially the pre-born for I have access to many words, but I will always vote for those who pledge to defend pre-born human life because I have only one vote and I need to cast it for those who have no vote but mine.
When my father was diagnosed with cancer he also needed open heart surgery. The question arose, which do we treat, the heart or the cancer. The doctors assured him that the cancer was slow growing and that he would die of lots of other things before he died of cancer. Thus the heart surgery was done and he was allowed a goodly number of years of extended life, all the while living with cancer. He could have chosen to treat the cancer but then he would have died many years earlier. He would have died cancer free but he would have died much earlier. Hardly a consolation for him or the family. He chose an immediate life saving operation and recognized that the cancer would still be there to be treated later.
In our society we have both a heart problem and a cancer problem. The heart problem continues to allow innocent human persons to be killed at will. The cancer problem continues to put the poor and needy at risk. I think we need, as in my father's case, to focus on the heart problem for it concerns life itself and not only the quality of that life. You have one vote. Use it for the greatest good.

MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA                 

This column is being written from Rome where I have traveled with the other Bishops of Region XII, which is comprised of the States of Alaska, Montana, Washington, Idaho and Oregon, for the purpose of greeting the Holy Father. This visit, which every Bishop is asked to make every five years, is known as the “ad limina” visit, a visit 'to the threshold', a visit to the heart of the Catholic Church of the Roman Rite. Besides the highlight, which is a personal visit of less then ten minutes with the Holy Father, we have the opportunity to visit a number of the other Congregations or “Offices” of the Holy See. Yesterday we visited the Congregation for Catholic Education which deals with all matters related to Vocations, Universities, Seminaries and Catholic Schools. This morning we spent an hour with the Congregation for Bishops and more than an hour with the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments. Tomorrow, which is Wednesday, we will visit the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Thursday we are slated for the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Saturday we complete our meetings with our visit to the Congregation for Clergy.
In addition to these informative and instructive meetings the Bishops gather to celebrate Mass in at least two of the Major Basilicas of Rome and possibly more. First thing Monday morning we were fortunate to begin our series of meetings, which is really a pilgrimage in many ways, with Mass at the tomb of Saint Peter located directly under the area of the main altar in Saint Peter's Basilica. As we stood around the altar our view was past the altar to a small coffin like box which contains the bones of Saint Peter. The Mass we celebrated, which is the one always celebrated at the tomb of Peter, is the Mass of Saints Peter and Paul. Standing there I could not help but think of Saint Peter's arduous journey to Rome and his ultimate crucifixion, upside down, there. I also felt as if Peter himself were standing around the altar with us remembering the same sacred events which we recall in our Mass. For us they are bread and wine which become the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus but for him they are real events. For him they are the last supper, the agony in the garden, the betrayal, the passion, the cross, the crucifixion, the death, the burial, the Resurrection, the Ascension and the coming of the Holy Spirit. There at Saint Peter's tomb these all became much more real, I could 'remember' them better because of an awareness of who was there. It is the person who is the primary witness to all these things upon whom Jesus chose to build His Church. It is this witness to whom Jesus entrusted the power of the keys. It is the chief witness to all these things who is personally represented by our present Holy Father. Pope John Paul II, while of a different age and a different ethnic background, is still Peter, the one upon whom Christ has chosen to build His Church.
We come to this threshold. The threshold of the tomb of Saint Peter, the threshold of the residence of the present Holy Father, the threshold of our Faith, the threshold of our Church. The visits to the Congregations are interesting and informative but the event around which the whole visit centers is a bit of individual, personal time with the Holy Father. This is scheduled for this afternoon in about three hours. It is the highlight of my days here. I can hardly wait!
On the plane coming over I sat next to a Methodist woman and her young daughter. In our conversation I mentioned that I was coming to see the Pope. She immediately wanted to know what I was going to say to the Pope. I have been wondering that myself ever since. I will spend a good portion of the next three hours considering precisely that. It was very interesting to see the reaction of this woman and her daughter. The girl, a youngster of 14, was traveling with a group of young people and she immediately went to them in another portion of the plane to report that she was sitting with a Bishop who was going to see the Pope. The question of the young people, “What are you going to say to the Pope?” We changed planes in Frankfurt and this group of non-Catholic youth wanted their pictures taken with the Bishop who was going to see the Pope. So there I was in the Frankfurt airport posing for various pictures with young people. It was as if we were at a Confirmation reception. It was great! It is easy to believe that the Holy Father is Peter, he is the One upon whom Christ has chosen to build His Church. In some ways the whole world knows this to be true, especially young people.
We also plan to celebrate Mass at the other great shrine of Rome, the Church of Saint Paul. It is referred to as Saint Paul Outside-the-Walls because it is built outside of the walls of the ancient City of Rome. Thus we visit and celebrate Mass at the tombs of the two great Apostles, Peter and Paul. Besides this we also visit and pray at the tombs of many great Church leaders. These include Saint Pius X, Pius XII, Blessed John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I just to name a few. The depth of the history and tradition at Rome, at Saint Peter's Basilica, at Saint Paul's, at the tombs of the Saints, at the Papal Palace is very reassuring. Here we discover anew that this is the Church which Jesus founded. Here we know with greater clarity that “thou art Peter and upon this Rock I will build My Church”. Here we discover anew that “I am with you always until the end of the world”. Here we understand a bit more of the promise of the Lord that “the gates of hell shall not prevail”.
The Holy Father has written and spoken often of the need to be men and women of hope, men and women who do not fear. Coming to this threshold of hope, to this threshold of faith, to this threshold of charity is both challenging and renewing. It calls me to be a man of greater hopefulness and joy. It calls me to be a man of deeper faith, a faith founded on the Apostles, founded on the Saints especially Peter and Paul. This time challenges me to live a much more self sacrificing and charitable life, a life of service to others, a life more clearly imitative of our Lord, who “came not to be served but to serve and give His life as a ransom for many”, a life more imitative of him whom I have the privilege of visiting this afternoon. What would you say to Him who represents so much, who exemplifies so much, who means so much? I think I will start with, “Thank you!”.

THE MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA                    June 17, 2004

What is truth? We recognize this simple three word question as the one Pontius Pilate asked Jesus just before handing Him over to be crucified. Jesus had just testified that He had come to bear witness to the truth and Pilate retorted, 'What is truth?' In many ways every age, every generation seeks to arrive at a grasp and understanding of the truth. Jesus referred to Himself as the Truth and told His disciples, you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free. Jesus did come to bear witness to the truth, the truth about God, the truth about man, the truth about good and evil, the truth about the world, the truth about heaven, purgatory and hell, the truth about the commandments, the truth about life, the truth about fallen human nature, the truth about redemption, the truth about salvation, the truth.
It is difficult to know the whole truth in one, even very intense, glance. At first glance science perceived the atom as the smallest particle of creation. Then they perceived the proton, neutron and electron as constitutive parts of the atom. Now they have found even smaller particles and I believe there is talk of a primordial substance named the gluon. Is this the arrival at the final, ultimate truth about the origin of the universe and the smallest of particles? Most likely not. Scientists will continue to investigate, they want to know with greater and greater certainty, they want to know the truth. Jesus did not give us any information to assist in the pursuit of these scientific truths. Some scientists perhaps hope to find a truth which would preclude the need for an Almighty, Creative, Loving, Forgiving God. They wrongly perceive that finding this truth would really 'set them free'. The truth is that the continued exploration of this inner space, just as the continued exploration of outer space, ultimately cries out for an explanation which science cannot provide. Where did it all come from in the first place? What is the nature and purpose of man? How is man different from all the other animals? What is truth?
Gaudium et Spes, the Pastoral Constitution of the Church in the Modern World makes reference to this continued march of science and notes: “In wonder at their own discoveries and their own might men are today troubled and perplexed by questions about current trends in the world, about their place and their role in the universe, about the meaning of individual and collective endeavor, and finally about the destiny of nature and of men.” (3) About these things there are certainly many possible theories and possibilities but in the midst of those theories and possibilities there is a truth to be discovered. Gaudium et Spes continues: “In our time his attempts to search out the secrets of the material universe and to bring it under his control have been extremely successful. Yet he has always looked for, and found, truths of a higher order. For his intellect is not confined to the range of what can be observed by the senses. It can, with genuine certainty, reach to realities known only to the mind, even though, as a result of sin, its vision has been clouded and its powers weakened. The intellectual nature of man finds at last its perfection, as it should, in wisdom, which gently draws the human mind to look for and to love what is true and good.” (15)
Some erroneously believe that this 'true and good' is determined by the individual conscience as opposed to being discovered by it. Thus the Document continues: “Deep within his conscience man discovers a law which he has not laid upon himself but which he must obey. Its voice, ever calling him to love and to do what is good and to avoid evil, tells him inwardly at the right moment: do this, shun that. For man has in his heart a law inscribed by God. … Through loyalty to conscience Christians are joined to other men in the search for truth and for the right solution to so many moral problems which arise both in the life of individuals and from social relationships. Hence, the more a correct conscience prevails, the more do persons and groups turn aside from blind choice and try to be guided by the objective standards of moral conduct. Yet it often happens that conscience goes astray through ignorance which it is unable to avoid, without thereby losing its dignity. This cannot be said of the man who takes little trouble to find out what is true and good, or when conscience is by degrees almost blinded through the habit of committing sin.” (16) The terms related to truth are clear: discovers a law, search for truth, correct conscience, objective standards, what is true and good.
The Holy Father expands on this discussion in his beautiful Encyclical, “Veritatis Splendor” - The Splendor of the Truth. He writes: “Certain currents of modern thought have gone so far as to exalt freedom to such an extent that it becomes an absolute, which would then be the source of values. This is the direction taken by doctrines which have lost the sense of the transcendent or which are explicitly atheistic. The individual conscience is accorded the status of a supreme tribunal of moral judgment which hands down categorical and infallible decisions about good and evil. To the affirmation that one has a duty to follow one's conscience is unduly added the affirmation that one's moral judgment is true merely by the fact that it has its origin in the conscience. But in this way the inescapable claims of truth disappear, yielding their place to a criterion of sincerity, authenticity and “being at peace with oneself”, so much so that some have come to adopt a radically subjectivistic conception of moral judgment.” (32)
We know from science that something is not true simply because someone 'believes' it to be true. The truth needs to be 'discovered' not 'created'. Moral truth likewise does exist and needs to be discovered. That discovery process rests more with seeking what is of God than simply seeking to justify that which my weakened, fallen human nature may prefer. As the Holy Father says: “conscience expresses itself in acts of “judgment” which reflect the truth about the good, and not in arbitrary “decisions”. The maturity and responsibility of these judgments-and, when all is said and done, of the individual who is their subject-are not measured by the liberation of the individual conscience from objective truth, in favor of an alleged autonomy in personal decisions, but, on the contrary, by an insistent search for truth and by allowing oneself to be guided by that truth in one's actions.” (61)

THE MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA                June 11, 2004

In each place to which I travel there are usually two or three people who comment that they read my articles religiously. I do not know if this is to ensure honorable mention of their Parish in the next week's missive or to curry some kind of favor with the Bishop but I must admit I do like to hear it. I have found over the years that those who disagree are much more likely to voice their disagreement than those who agree. It could be argued that there are more letters expressing discontent, in general, precisely because there are more Catholics who do not see things the same way. The question then to be asked is whether the number of letters coming in favoring or opposing a particular stand or position is any indicator at all of the actual number of persons in the pews holding to those views. Some might propose taking a poll. This would be an interesting exercise but it would not necessarily be an indicator of what, in the Church, should be done or not done, affirmed or not affirmed. While Bishops are certainly interested in knowing what the faithful think and feel this cannot always be the criterion for their determination of what should be said or done. There is, after all, that sometimes inconvenient thing known as truth to which Bishops, as well as all the faithful, must ultimately be accountable. The desire to take a poll, while a good means to determine popularity, is a very poor indicator of what is true. Popularity is not required for something to be true. No one of us is immune from the desire to be appreciated, loved and accepted but the desire for these things cannot offset the greater desire to stand up for and uphold the truth.
The little places visited this weekend included Chiloquin and Bly. The drive was not too notable in part because I was recovering from the deleterious effects of air travel the day before and simply focused on keeping the car on the road. The drive from Bend to Chiloquin is an isle largely lined with trees and those who are frequent readers know that this is not my favorite terrain. The Sprague River, however, which the meandering road between Chiloquin and Bly largely accompanies, provides some wonderfully attractive sights and views. When I traveled from Lakeview several weeks ago I took the opportunity to stop briefly at a roadside picnic ground to walk along the river and view the scenery. The river, at the point of the picnic grounds, was quite shallow and not all that wide. There is something, however, about running water which automatically calls one to relaxation and refreshment. The sight and the sound of the water, the fresh smell, the life it speaks of and supports, its refreshing coolness, its tantalizing promise of adventure just a little further up or down stream are all there. At the picnic ground there was a site where eons ago someone inscribed simple figures on the rock outcropping overlooking the river. Not only modern day travelers but those of ancient times as well recognized here a place of particular beauty and significance. Those petroglyphs have recently become literally the target of some vandals and it is very sad to see the bullet pock marks disfiguring the work of some long dead artist. There is a truth here and regardless of whether a majority of people believe that these petroglyphs have anything to offer modern man or not, I believe they should be preserved.
There were five young people confirmed at Bly. They were a little shy and a little intimidated by the Bishop but genuinely wholesome young people. I mentioned to the people that they are among the more than twenty parishes or missions staffed or served by priests from other Dioceses and nations. This certainly points out the need for vocations to the priesthood from our own families, parishes and Diocese. While we are very grateful for the service which our often international priests provide we cannot take for granted that such priests will always be available for us. We must work toward, pray for and encourage a response to God's call to religious vocations to priesthood and religious life which He is undoubtedly giving to our own young men and women. The voice of the world is so loud that the quiet still voice of God calling to ever deeper commitment to holiness and self sacrificing service is often drowned out. Perhaps if we spent more time in quiet reflection before our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament and listened intently to what He was telling us instead of being inundated by worldly 'noise' there would be ample hearers of the call. At the wayside picnic area I found myself quiet and reflective before a very simple petroglyph. There I needed no conversation, no radio, no television, no DVD or CD player. There I had all I needed for that moment - peaceful quiet and something to reflect upon. Before our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament we certainly have something infinitely greater.
Mass at Chiloquin provided an opportunity to briefly greet the people and to engage in a bit of lively debate. The parish is small but the spirit is alive and this is true in many of the very tiny and relatively remote parishes and missions across the Diocese. It almost seems that, despite their smallness, and indeed perhaps all the more importantly because of the relatively small size of these parishes, there is a need to maintain a close contact with the Diocesan Church and with the Universal Church. The loss of this essential connection, while it may sometimes be preferred and even popular in certain communities, could be compared to losing ancient petroglyphs. Not everyone appreciates what they mean but those with true wisdom know they need to be preserved. Not everyone appreciates what it means to be bonded to a larger, universal Church but those with true wisdom know this bond needs to be preserved. I am certain that Game and Parks personnel would not look kindly on those who chose to deface the rocks overlooking Sprague River. This zeal for ancient petroglyphs is not some part of a personal agenda on the part of State employees but a recognition of the objective significance, beauty and connection with past ages. I cannot imagine anyone suggesting that the rule about not defacing these ancient signs was a personal rule composed by an over zealous Park Ranger.

THE MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA            June 3, 2004

The number of letters to the editor in recent weeks regarding the legitimacy of pro-choice and pro-abortion public officials receiving Holy Communion is both interesting and distressing. Interesting because of the vehemence of opinions on both sides of the issue. Distressing because of the number who see no contradiction between acting in a fashion totally opposed to the tenets and beliefs of the Catholic Church and receiving Holy Communion in that same Church. I have never received communion in an other-than-Catholic church. It would be a lie for me to do so. We certainly recognize the immense difference between the Eucharistic faith professed in the Catholic Church and that of other-than-Catholic churches but we are similar in that receiving communion is also a 'sign' of philosophical / theological 'communion'. The reception of communion would be a proclamation that I am of one mind and heart with the official teachings and beliefs of that other-than-Catholic church. There are certainly a great number of points of convergence between what I believe and what some other-than-Catholics believe. I do not condemn other-than-Catholics but I am not in complete 'communion' with them and it would be a lie for me to claim full communion with them and then to ratify that lie by also receiving that full sign of communion with them.
As Catholics we believe, as our Church teaches, that Holy Communion is the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus. We know from our Catechism that Communion nourishes us spiritually in the same way that physical food nourishes the body. We have a very deep and profound reverence and respect for this great Eucharistic Mystery. The reception of Holy Communion, however, is not only spiritual nourishment it is also a sign and an expression of oneness, of unity. The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has asked that the following statement be included in worship aids as an ongoing instruction for those coming to the Catholic Church. First, Catholics are reminded that they need to be properly disposed and “participants should not be conscious of grave sin and normally should have fasted for one hour.” For those other-than-Catholics the following is added: “Because Catholics believe that the celebration of the Eucharist is a sign of the reality of the oneness of faith, life, and worship, members of those churches with whom we are not yet fully united are ordinarily not admitted to Holy Communion.”
It is certainly proper to recognize that those “with whom we are not yet fully united” refers to members of other-than-Catholic churches but its meaning can very well extend beyond this very strict interpretation. This 'full communion' with the Catholic Church is well defined: “Those baptized are fully in the communion of the Catholic Church on this earth who are joined with Christ in its visible structure by the bonds of the profession of faith, the sacraments, and ecclesiastical governance.” (Canon 205) Simply being a baptized Catholic does not in and of itself guarantee 'full communion'. This is quite strongly indicated in a subsequent Canon: “The Christian Faithful, even in their own manner of acting, are always obliged to maintain communion with the Church.” (Canon 209)
The question then is whether is it is possible, in accord with Catholic Church teaching, to say: “What I believe personally as an article of faith is an article of faith … [But it is not] appropriate in the United States for a legislator to legislate personal religious beliefs for the rest of the country.” I wonder what Saint Thomas More would have to say about that! In other words, the manner of acting (for public officials) has no bearing whatsoever on 'communion with the Church'. Clearly the manner of acting, and perhaps more the manner of acting than seemingly empty words, is a declaration of what one believes.
The public official who says, “I maintain full communion with the Catholic Church and I continue to receive communion in that Church and I will vote for every and any law which continues to provide and even expand access to abortion” is hardly maintaining union with the Church in his 'manner of acting'. I try to imagine myself believing something very fervently and wholeheartedly and then making a choice, without duress, to act in a way contrary to that belief. I am not here talking about weakness and lapses into occasional sinfulness but clear bold and categorical public affirmations. I wonder if it is really possible to say, “I believe one thing very strongly but I commit myself to act consistently in the opposite way.” No, I do not wonder about this at all. I believe it is categorically impossible for a person of integrity to hold to such an obtuse, bifurcated notion of the human person. We cannot claim to truly believe one way and pledge to act in an other. This is especially applicable to life. Actions speak louder than words. Even actions which are politically based speak more loudly about what a person really believes than what he claims to really, really believe.
If a person believes, as the Church teaches, and as science confirms, that human life begins at conception, it is not possible, at the same time, to seek to maintain laws which deny human rights to this pre-born child, much less actively militate for the 'rights' of others to pursue the death of this human person.
“The Christian Faithful, even in their own manner of acting, are always obliged to maintain communion with the Church.” (Canon 209)
Those who seek Eucharistic Communion in the Catholic Church do have an obligation, as a condition for that reception, to maintain a real and genuine oneness of faith, life and worship with the Catholic Church. Unfortunately there are some Catholic politicians whose statements, positions, voting records and stances, particularly on life issues are so far from 'communion with the Church' that it is impossible to see how they can qualify for the 'full communion' required for admission to full Eucharistic Communion. What they do screams so loudly about what they believe that it drowns out the tininess of the voice with which they affirm what they claim to believe. Their manner of acting excludes them. Where their manner of acting is so clearly in opposition to 'full communion' then that lack of communion needs to be first privately and then, if necessary, publicly declared.

THE MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA        May 28, 2004

The highlight of the week was the ordination to the transitional diaconate of a seminarian for the Diocese of Baker. This seminarian hales from Nigeria by way of Italy and has been studying for our Diocese for the past five years. God willing he will be ordained as a priest around this same time in 2005. Pray for vocations. What made this ordination a highlight was not only the fact that we now have an additional deacon serving in the Diocese who will ultimately be ordained a priest but the international connections manifested at the ordination.
The priests attending the ordination who are serving in our Diocese come to us from Nigeria, Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Poland, and Sri Lanka. In addition we have priests from Columbia, Malta, Mexico, California and Nebraska. The Franciscans are represented as well as the Jesuits. Present also at the ordination was a relatively large contingent from the Nigerian community in Portland who came dressed in traditional Nigerian attire and whose lively, exuberant and joyful demeanor greatly enhanced our celebration. We rely a great deal on these 'missionaries' from Africa and other continents and perhaps we tend to view them merely as temporary necessities. The celebration on Friday reminded me that we are greatly blessed by the richness of the cultures which they bring to mix with ours. It is sometimes difficult for parishioners to understand what our foreign brothers are saying because of the vast differences in accent and even pronunciation but I have been told recently that it was not all that different when the first Irish priests came to serve here. They could not be well understood either. I recognize that greater clarity of language is desirable and I do encourage the priests to continue to work on accent reduction, pronunciation, clearer enunciation and conscientiousness about linguistic differences. At the same time I continue to remind parishioners that we rely on these priests to provide us with basic essential services such as access to the Sacraments and Sunday Mass and we have an obligation to be grateful. It is not easy to suffer the linguistic challenges and I can assure you it is not easy for the priests either. Unless and until more young men from the Diocese itself step forward and offer their lives for the sake of the Kingdom of God in Eastern Oregon we will continue to rely on the generosity of other families from other nations to supply our priesthood needs. While there is certainly need to break down communication barriers and this must be worked at, there is also room for improvement in our own work of actively promoting vocations to the priesthood from our own Diocesan family.
The ordination took me to Baker City, the location of our Cathedral, the Mother Church of the Diocese. It is fitting and proper and even recommended that celebrations such as ordinations take place in this Diocesan Church because a man is ordained for the whole Diocese and not for any particular parish. The Cathedral becomes the symbol for the unity of the whole Diocese. We may view the Cathedral as just another parish Church, and it is the parish church of Baker City, but it is more than that, it is the Diocesan Church. Thus I have committed myself, as much as possible, to host Diocesan celebrations there. I am always very grateful to the staff and especially the choir at Saint Francis de Sales Cathedral because they always accommodate me so well, work so cooperatively with me on these celebrations and always ensure that they are celebrations of beauty, dignity and respect. I look forward to celebrations there. I hope that everyone in the Diocese recognizes the centrality of this Diocesan Church and the celebrations which occur there and make genuine efforts to attend if at all possible.
Following the ordination I needed to get to Lakeview for Mass and Confirmation. On the way down Highway 395 I realized that I had never had occasion to travel from Burns to Lakeview and so it was a new scenic byway. I was very surprised by Lake Abert which is certainly beautiful but not all that useful. It covers about 60 square miles and, if I read the legend properly, has an average depth of 6 feet. The high concentration of sodium carbonates and other salts make it largely uninhabitable but it is lovely to look at. I was also very surprised when pulling into Lakeview from the north to see just off to the right the steam plume of the Lakeview geyser. At first I thought this had to be a local invention but then remembering the highly sulfuric odors near Lake Abert and the steam heat utilized at Klamath Falls I realized it was probably a real natural phenomenon. It blasted water into the air twice in the brief span of time it took me to drive past the entrance to Geyser Lane. While not as impressive as Old Faithful the geothermics involved seem to be the same.
The Confirmation at Lakeview involved thirteen fine young men and women who were well prepared and who, despite a bit of nervousness, answered questions and survived quite readily. When I see young people such as these I cannot help but wonder if the Lord is not planting the seeds of religious vocations in their minds and hearts. They are certainly devoted to God and the things of God, they come from families committed to the Church, they are not imbued with the errors of the secular world, they are bright, articulate, hard working, unassuming and respectful. I believe God is calling them. I believe God's grace is not lacking. I believe that if parents and grandparents and god parents and parishioners would begin to mention to such fine young people the possibility of religious vocation then that grace of God could be activated and could then be clearly heard by these young people. I do believe that God is calling forth vocations to the priesthood and religious life from the midst of our own families; from the midst of your families. If not from your family, then from whom should we expect or anticipate priests? Many have asked me over the years: Bishop, can't we have a priest from our own Diocese whom we can clearly understand? I in turn ask you: My dear people can we not have priests from our own Diocese who could then be assigned to serve you? If not from your family, then from whence shall they come?

THE MIND AND HEART OF BISHOP VASA                May 21, 2004

Even though the week just past seemed to be no more or less productive or unproductive than a typical week in the Diocese of Baker I must admit that it feels a bit dissipated. This sense of feeling scattered as opposed to being properly focused is probably a sign that I need to take a day off or maybe even a bit of vacation. Maybe the coming non-observed Holy Day of Ascension Thursday will provide just a moment of respite. Despite the fact that the celebration and the 'obligation' of this day, in various regions of the country, is transferred to Sunday we would all do well to try to find some way to 'observe' the traditional day of celebration of the Ascension.
The week does not seem to have been any more scattered, in terms of activities, than any other week but there were a few differences. One was my lawn. I mowed parts of it once last week and then decided that maybe it needed to be power raked. How would I know? I bought the little attachments and the special mower blade and raked a section of the lawn. After collecting most of the debris the lawn looked no better than it did before. Later I raked it again after buying replacement attachments because the originals were worn to nubs. The second collection of debris was greater than the first. I do not know if this is progress or not. I do not know if I did any good but I did feel good about doing something. It may end up being a mistake but I was once told that the only person who is assured of not making a mistake is the person who is careful to do nothing and even then doing nothing may prove to be a mistake. I do not know how the lawn will fare but the rhubarb seems to be prospering. Maybe that is largely because I do tend to leave the rhubarb alone. Come to think of it the peonies are gearing up for what promises to be a record number of blooms and I tend to leave them alone as well. Perhaps there are some who would suggest that I do the same with the lawn. Perhaps there are some who think I should do the same with the liturgy and with the practices which have become a part of the standard operating procedures in the Diocese. On the power rake package the instructions indicate that one should not panic if it looks like the entire lawn has been destroyed. It did look a little like that. I am confident that the lawn will be healthier in the long run. Seeing the pruned cherry and apple trees along the gorge and then seeing them now heavily laden with fruit gives hope to the belief that the lawn will be healthier. Without that pruning, which looks very severe and harsh, apples and cherries would never bear rich fruit.
The highpoints of my week were Conferences, Councils and a Convention. The Conferences I refer to are not meetings but rather local operational bodies of the Saint Vincent de Paul Society. I had the opportunity to visit the 'shops' in Redmond and Prineville on Thursday and am truly amazed at the level of dedication and commitment of the Vincentian volunteers. In Redmond we stopped and shopped at the thrift store. Clothes in abundance are available there at rock bottom prices. I occasionally shop at such places and sometimes feel a